On the edge of the waste bin, precariously – Part One.

Sunday, March 2nd, 2008

There is a God who created us, at least that’s what I believe. I thought I’d jump right in and say a few things about this, as longtime readers may agree I’ve been known to do (with unfortunate irregularity, I’d say.) The reason this Creator is fascinating to me is because as a (lower case) creator myself I can’t help but draw some comparisons, or at least attempt to, between God’s character and my own. I don’t think that’s heresy or blasphemy or whatever, because in God’s holy book he tells us that he has created us in his own image. So of course some of his character has been imprinted on us, different bits on different folks. With me he shared his desire to create something out of nothing, and although I do so on an infinitely smaller scale and to much less success, I feel the deepest connection with this Creator sometimes when I, myself, am creating. So there, that is something of a preface.

Well, this past week I was doing a little bit in my studio, trying to finish my latest painting before the weekend so I could deliver it to my people, and in between work on said painting I was preparing a new canvas for my next painting. The idea was that I would have it stretched, gessoed, and ready to go by the time I finished this other painting. Well, somewhere along the way some unforeseen physics took over, or more likely I got sloppy, and my newest canvas was saggy, crooked, and barely stretched. I noticed this as I was gessoing it and became frustrated, jabbing the handle of my paint brush into the slack canvas and finally tossing it aside with a grumble, never to be touched again. It’s not the first painting I’ve destroyed and then left for dead, but the fact that it happened at such an early stage gave me reason to think. What if God, this Creator that I am supposedly attempting to emulate, gave up so quickly on his creations? Granted it’s not a perfect parallel because God would not have poorly stretched a canvas to begin with, it’s his creations that tend to self-destruct or destroy one another, but regardless, what if? What if God gave up at the first sign of deviance from the plan? In my studio (and who knows where else) there are stacks of neglected canvases that I don’t intend ever to return to, because they disappointed me at some point and they weren’t worth the trouble to correct. What if God looked at us this way? Does he? Does it ever get to a point where our lines are just so wavery and our colors so muddy and our proportions so disgustingly askew that God just throws up his hands and says, “Eesh, enough! I can’t look at this piece of garbage anymore!” Does God have a waste bin full of discarded failures?

I didn’t stop thinking there. That is, I did come some kind of resolution on these wonderings. Maybe you can already guess where I’m going with this, but I think I’ll pause here for now. If you’re inclined, you should consider these things. I guess asking you to do this presumes that you believe in the same God as I do, or a God at all, but even if you don’t it doesn’t hurt to think in abstracts, occasionally. This whole post is a “what if” after all. So there I’ll leave it tonight. To be continued, I guess.

Part two. 

Cheese is good; we like cheese sandwiches, right?

Monday, February 18th, 2008

I’ve been going back and forth between two equally cheesy Doogie Howser opening lines for today’s post. One reads like this: “Giving something up is difficult, especially if it is something that you have come to rely on. But as time passes, the benefits of giving up such dependencies compound at a fairly rapid rate.” Can’t you just picture the Doog typing something like that? The second went thus, “Sometimes when you have been waiting for something for a long time it only makes that thing better when it arrives. Sometimes, though, waiting so long for something brings expectations that can’t possibly be met.”

I’m sorry that my writing style has somehow boiled down to something so bland. But I do think I will go ahead and finish those two thoughts because, in spite of their initial presentation, I think they are some blog-worthy ideas. So here, just imagine me sitting at a circa-1990 IBM, wearing that white medical coat and maybe a fluffy blond crew cut and maybe somehow that will make this more easily digestible:

Giving something up is difficult, especially if it is something that you have come to rely on. But as time passes, the benefits of giving up such dependencies compound at a fairly rapid rate. (Haha, okay.) For Lent I gave up drinking soda and listening to music, at least in environments that I had control of (my car, my home, my computer). At first my body screamed for caffein and sugar, and my ears felt neglected as morning passed with alternating silence and the crackling murmur of talk radio. I have only been “fasting” in these respects for 13 days now, but I have already lost my appetite for soda and find myself relishing my self-imposed silence. I don’t say this to boast, because surely it is an act of grace that I can leave these idols (perhaps temporarily) behind me, and surely, as my parenthetical hinted at, I risk returning to them with equal or increased devotion after the fast has ended. But maybe I won’t, because I feel healthier, in small ways. When I stop drinking soda I drink more water and milk and juice and tea. These things are good for my body, or at least they are better for it than Cherry Coke. When I stop listening to music I spend more time thinking, which I admit can be an idol in itself and can be just as inward and unproductive as habitual consumption of prerecorded sounds and images.  But thinking, for me, is one step closer to prayer, which is the ultimate goal. That is to say, not all thoughts are prayers, but by allowing myself to be incessantly distracted I run the risk that few thoughts turn into prayers. I realize I am sounding very self-righteous by typing these things, but be assured I am referring always back to my own practices and my own habits, not anyone else’s who may be perfectly healthy and productive in the way that they consume.

Next thought, and slightly more concrete: Sometimes when you have been waiting for something for a long time it only makes that thing better when it arrives. Sometimes, though, waiting so long for something brings expectations that can’t possibly be met. Such was the case with my recent viewing of Persepolis, which, while fantastic, wasn’t quite what I had been hoping for. Visually it exceeded my most demanding expectations, and if only for the animation you (anyone who has ever loved a line or the way it moved) need to see this film. I guess that leaves the story, then, as the element which disappointed me, and I’m afraid it’s probably as simple as the Harry Potter fansters who object to every detail that was left out for sake of the flow and duration of the movie. And certainly there was much less omitted from the Persepolis canon than the Harry Potter canon, so probably it’s just that some of my favorite parts were gone, or else a scene was there in picture but Satrapi’s narration was not. For example, the scene where Marjane first leaves Iran and her parents are seeing her off at the airport: Marjane writes, “I couldn’t just go. I turned around to see them one last time.” We are then hit with an image of her mother who has fainted and lies limp in her father’s arms, and Marjane is looking on this horror-stricken and she writes, “It would have been better to just go.” The scene’s equivalent in the movie was gripping, but without that line it lost some of its impact, it lost that fist in the gut crumpling effect. I want to see the film again and force myself to view it separately from the books, because I know it was beautiful (everyone is saying that it is a beautiful film) but I couldn’t quite get past the marks I felt it was missing.

I always get nervous when I play the critic here, especially when I am criticizing someone I admire, and try not to do too much of it (although I think I mentioned earlier how completely disappointed I was with Satrapi’s “Embroideries“). After all, you never know who might read, and what if I’ve just destroyed my chances at being Marjane Satrapi’s best friend? But more than that I think about my own creative pursuits and how quickly I can be cut down to size and left with spirits trampled. I don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings. Maybe that’s presumptuous on my part, to think I even have the power to. But words are strong, man! I guess you have to give up your right to the kid-gloves when you step into the public light. I’ll continue to enjoy my gentler, more private world as an amateur. Still, I’m sorry if you’re famous and you have, for some reason, read something here that hurt your feelings.

And finally, since today is Superficial Monday I will say something about the appearance of this blog, which you may have noticed has changed a few times in the past couple weeks. I am trying to settle on something that works both structurally and aesthetically, and haven’t found it yet. I appreciate the individual feedback you have given me, to those who have given me individual feedback, and hopefully it won’t be long before Easel Ain’t Easy is looking pretty and also functional. Thank you for reading this long-winded and rather disjointed post.

What do you lose your breath for?

Friday, February 1st, 2008

Today I lost my breath for art. Really. Art made my heart pound. Literally and quite physically, that is. Because I was given a mission: to deliver a grant proposal to some civic building in downtown Madison, and I was given a deadline. It was exciting. But, now, if you know anything about being six-months young in Madison, you know that nothing makes sense downtown. None of the streets are two-way and there is not even a sensible grid-pattern but something like this:

It is a very nice layout, aesthetically, as it allows not one, not two, but eight incredible driving views of the Capitol, (and I thought Milwaukee’s view of the Art Museum/Starburst was cool from Wisconsin Ave) but when you don’t know quite where you’re going it can be a real trick.

I reach the downtown with about fifteen minutes left on the clock. I have a vague idea of where I am going. I have a street name, an address, a wrinkled printout of awfully cryptic driving directions from Yahoo Maps. I’m looking for Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, and feel I’m close, so I pull my car into an available parking space. I have two dimes on my person which buys me 11 minutes at the meter. Fortunately it is Casual Day at work, so in my jeans and Chuck Taylor knockoffs I start down the sidewalk in a quick jog, but where am I going? I won’t have enough time at the meter, I realize, and jog back to my car. I stop in a hair salon and ask for four quarters for my dollar. Kindly the receptionist obliges me, and I ask her where I might find Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. She tells me it is the next street over, parallel to this one. “Parallel to this one?” I ask, gesturing to the street on the corner. “Yes, parallel to that one,” she agrees with another smile. We are not gesturing to the same street, though neither of us are aware of it at the time. I thank her and jog back out of doors and plug the meter with a hefty 36 minutes. I’ve lost time, and now, instead, I run. I run down a block, I run left a block. I see a woman standing on the corner and ask her where I’m going. She says to turn left and I’ll be there. I thank her and I run to the left and I am not there (perhaps she thought I asked for King Street). I run to the men waiting at the curb for the bus, and they direct me three blocks in the other direction. I thank them and I run off, and now my shoes are untied and I’m gasping for breath because I haven’t run like this since 8th grade basketball. But I’m running out of time. The art depends on me! I run from corner to corner, the grant proposal tucked under my arm. I run with abandon, dashing in front of cars and leaping over those who have gone before me and not made it; I’m crashing through hurdles of budget cuts and dashed dreams and an artless future. I am the runner of Marathon! And when I reach the Department of Cultural Affairs I will die, having exclaimed with the last of my strength, “Here! A grant! And all of the beautiful things in life must go on!”

The woman at the desk is pleasant, smiles when I burst through the door and say between gasps, “I have a (gasp) grant proposal to (gasp) deliver!”

“You are just in time,” she says, and she seems proud of me. It is 4:28. I, too, am a little proud of myself. Pieces of satisfaction break off of me and drift upward, lodging themselves into the ceiling where they will hang forever. I have been leaving pieces of satisfaction behind me ever since this happened. I enjoy a mission. And I can certainly use the exercise.

Digitize, my love.

Friday, December 28th, 2007

There was a strange and wonderful tide of digital events today.  This morning I arose relatively early (by Christmas vacation standards) to get to work finishing my comic strip by its deadline, and I thought, “The past few times I’ve colored this using watercolors I was definitely underwhelmed,” and so the natural next turn was toward Photoshop.  After a half hour of fumbling around with my laptop’s touchpad my dear brother saw me and said, “Do you want to use my Wacom tablet?”  And I said, “Yes!”  And I forgot how much fun–and efficient!–it can be to Wacom.  And furthermore I’ve come to believe that staying in the lines while coloring is strictly for kindergarteners:

(Click image for a full view) I suppose you could call this a preview (pick up your copies of the Riverwest Currents this January!).  What, I didn’t tell you that my comic strip is about a blogger?  Hm.

Anyway, this evening I went to hang out with my friend Holly who gifted me with a ”Finger Beats” drum machine, and later in the evening an old Yamaha keyboard, both of which couldn’t sound less like real instruments, but in the most exciting way.  Born in me were ideas for solo electronic projects or at least experiments.  I guess I’d put my money on “experiments.”

Somewhere in the middle of these two digital happenings my family and I took a trip to the zoo and I fed a cracker to a giraffe and watched an otter dive into a pool of near-frozen water and it was all very organic and I refreshing, with the snow and the cold air and the smells and noises of animals.    I think I’ll always prefer the organic world, but these occasional rendez-vous with the digital are kind of exhilarating.  Anyway, it was a nice day, and thanks for reading about it.

One thing about Forsythia.

Friday, December 21st, 2007

There is a new trend this winter: people break icicles off of their houses and stick them pointing upright out of a snowbank, like spikes. I like this. I probably shouldn’t–I’m sure it is dangerous, but I like the aesthetic. It’s about time we did something creative with our icicles, where previously the British have outdone us, or at least Andy Goldsworthy has:

Andy Goldsworthy is The Man, if I may say so. Remind me to scan pictures of a project I did based on his work. In fact, I’m going to spend ten minutes looking for those pictures right now…

Well, I couldn’t find them. And after I gave up looking I went to pick up some dinner, so actually it’s been more than ten minutes that have passed and I’m sure you are just dying to know what this Andy Goldsworthy project of mine looked like but you’ll just have to keep on waiting. For now I’ll just tell you it involved Forsythia and a pool of mud, and yes, a clumsy neighborhood dog did come very close to destroying my vision, but no, he did not prevail.

Edit: Greetings friends from around the globe–it seems that this is my most popular post, and probably you reached it by searching for Andy Goldsworthy, and maybe you were disappointed to find I didn’t have much more insight to offer on the genius of a man. But maybe you would still accept my invitation to visit the rest of my blog, simply by clicking the magic link which is here. Thanks!

What are you doing tomorrow night?

Thursday, December 6th, 2007

You’re going to this art show, that’s what! (I’ve got comics in it.)

Please check it out, there will be bands and comics and probably beer and bratwurst too! I really wish I could make it, but I have a work function that evening. Be my proxy?

It’s strange. When National Novel Writing Month was going on there was talk of a door that exists inside your mind—the door to your imagination. It was suggested that the practice of daily writing would lead you to that door, open that door, and beckon you to cross through that door. Once inside the realm of your imagination, one proposed, there were really no limits. I feel like I may have opened that door when I was writing the second half of my book, but really just kind of dipped a toe into it. Maybe I took a cautious first step. Now that I’m finished with the month-long novel writing challenge, though, I feel like that foot is getting sucked further in. I introduced some characters, some situations, and my imagination is pulling at me, wanting me to explore further. Maybe this whole novel-writing challenge really was just an incredibly time-consuming warm up exercise. But I think I might be warmed up. I think I’m ready to go.

 

I’ve been having dreams about Northern California lately. About Humboldt County, to be specific. I may as well tell you that the second half of my book takes place in Humboldt County, which was an absolute blast to revisit (via the imagination door, not an actual trip.) I think that my next trip after Hawaii needs to be there—to Fortuna, Scotia, Ferndale, Arcata, Trinidad, and Eureka. A couple weekends ago we watched The Majestic, which was filmed in Ferndale, which is the town where we attended church on Sundays and where a couple of my friends lived. I had to hold my hand over my mouth to keep from shouting, “I remember that street!” or “I used to go to that beach!” every time something familiar came on screen. I have such a fondness for that part of the country.

 

The first half of my book takes place in Milwaukee, or somewhere unnamed just North of Milwaukee. I know that “write what you know” has long since been removed from the official tome of advice for writers, but I still enjoy some old-fashioned advice. Probably, though, I shouldn’t be sharing any details about any of this, being at such an early stage. By the time this story is readable it may have shifted to Brussels and Miami or Sheboygan or somewhere, and then you will all be saying, “But we were looking forward to Milwaukee!” And I would hate to disappoint.

Those talents are not meant to be buried.

Sunday, October 14th, 2007

In Bluebeard, Vonnegut writes:

A moderately gifted person who would have been a community treasure a thousand years ago has to give up, has to go into some other line of work, since modern communications put him or her into daily competition with nothing but world’s champions.

Yes, how many of us moderately gifted people would second this? How many times in this blog alone have I moaned about being good at something but not great? I’m not a champion writer, painter, cartoonist, musician, conversationalist, poet, critic, or philosopher, though I may have some amount of skill in any one of those things. And how often I find myself resentful of my mediocre status, wishing to excel in one thing–in any one thing. But do you know what? This is greed. I’m given a portion of talent and it’s not enough. I want more talent, I want better talents, and I focus so intently on my lack of “championship” (as defined by the world, no doubt) that I neglect to realize that a gift is a gift and how greatly I’ve been blessed to have been blessed at all. To have any amount of talent is a gift from God!

I wrote about this very thing just a few days ago. I mentioned how I’d like to play the drums, but since I’m not a gifted musician by the world’s standards, that I should stick to something in which I stand a chance of being acknowledged. I was wrong. Since modern communication has alerted the world to talent like Paul McCartney and Bob Dylan and Sufjan Stevens I will never be considered a world class musician, but dang it, I like writing a song every now and then. And ironically, that modern communication which Vonnegut referred to has, since then, increased to such a degree that I can put my songs up here and here and, amateurish though they may be, they are out there for the entire world to hear. I can put my paintings, however unrefined, here, and my stories and essays here in this blog or wherever. I can put my comics in those papers who graciously oblige me, I can take part in an art show when the opportunity comes up. And I can be grateful and humbled by the fact that I have even an ounce of talent at all. To be labeled a “community treasure” feeds the prideful part of our nature, after all. To be spared such an ugly beast as pride is just another gift. I will joyfully embrace the talents I’ve been given, in precisely the magnitude they’ve been given to me.

You, reader, should think about this as well. I know you have talents.